Harrelson v. Wilmington Coca-Cola Bottling Co.

208 N.C. 704
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedNovember 1, 1935
StatusPublished

This text of 208 N.C. 704 (Harrelson v. Wilmington Coca-Cola Bottling Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Harrelson v. Wilmington Coca-Cola Bottling Co., 208 N.C. 704 (N.C. 1935).

Opinion

Pee. CubiaM.

Tbe plaintiff did not except to tbe order of tbe trial court, allowing tbe motion of tbe defendant, at tbe close of all tbe evidence, for judgment as of nonsuit. For tbis reason, tbe order is not subject to review by tbis Court.

Tbe only exception in tbe record is to tbe judgment. As there is no error in tbe judgment, it must be affirmed. McCoy v. Trust Co., 204 N. C., 721, 169 S. E., 644, and cases there cited.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McCoy v. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co.
169 S.E. 644 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1933)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
208 N.C. 704, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harrelson-v-wilmington-coca-cola-bottling-co-nc-1935.