Harrelson v. Wilmington Coca-Cola Bottling Co.

208 N.C. 704
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided November 1, 1935·Published

Opinion

Pee. CubiaM.

Tbe plaintiff did not except to tbe order of tbe trial court, allowing tbe motion of tbe defendant, at tbe close of all tbe evidence, for judgment as of nonsuit. For tbis reason, tbe order is not subject to review by tbis Court.

Tbe only exception in tbe record is to tbe judgment. As there is no error in tbe judgment, it must be affirmed. McCoy v. Trust Co., 204 N. C., 721, 169 S. E., 644, and cases there cited.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harrelson v. Wilmington Coca-Cola Bottling Co., 208 N.C. 704 (N.C. 1935).

208 N.C. 704 (Harrelson v. Wilmington Coca-Cola Bottling Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McCoy v. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co.
169 S.E. 644 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1933)