Harrelson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Harrelson v. State

499 So. 2d 939, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 192, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 6215

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 6, 1987

DocketNo. 86-1797

StatusPublished

This text of 499 So. 2d 939 (Harrelson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Harrelson v. State, 499 So. 2d 939, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 192, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 6215 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Because Whitehead v. State, 498 So.2d 863 (Fla.1986) (decided after sentence was pronounced in the present case), holds that the habitual offender statute cannot be used as an alternative to guidelines sentencing, the State has conceded that the defendant is. entitled to be resentenced. Accordingly, the sentence is reversed and the cause remanded for resentencing.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Because Whitehead v. State, 498 So.2d 863 (Fla.1986) (decided after sentence was pronounced in the present case), holds that the habitual offender statute cannot be used as an alternative to guidelines sentencing, the State has conceded that the defendant is. entitled to be resentenced. Accordingly, the sentence is reversed and the cause remanded for resentencing.

Reversed and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

499 So. 2d 939, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 192, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 6215, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harrelson-v-state-fladistctapp-1987.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack