Harrelson v. Jackson

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedApril 2, 2019
Docket2019 NYSlipOp 50450(U)
StatusPublished

This text of Harrelson v. Jackson (Harrelson v. Jackson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Harrelson v. Jackson, (N.Y. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion



Shelitha Harrelson,

against

Damon Jackson, Respondent, and Tampara Jackson, Respondent-Appellant.


Respondent Tampara Jackson appeals from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, New York County (Jack Stoller, J.), dated March 30, 2018, which denied her motion to vacate the portion of the default judgment awarding landlord possession against her in a holdover summary proceeding, and for leave to interpose an answer.

Per Curiam.


Order (Jack Stoller, J.), dated March 30, 2018, reversed, with $10 costs, motion granted, the portion of the default final judgment awarding petitioner possession against appellant Tampara Jackson is vacated, and appellant permitted to serve an answer within 10 days after service of a copy of this order with notice of entry.

Considering the strong policy favoring resolution of cases on the merits (see Chevalier v. 368 E. 148th St. Assoc., LLC, 80 AD3d 411, 413—414 [2011]), we favorably exercise our discretion and grant appellant's motion to vacate the portion of the default judgment awarding petitioner possession as against her. Our examination of the record satisfies us that appellant's actions were not motivated by willfulness or an intent to deliberately default, she has demonstrated at least a colorable defense to this intra-family holdover proceeding, and there is no indication that petitioner (appellant's sister) will suffer any prejudice (see Auerbach v Tregerman, 106 AD3d 633 [2013]). In the circumstances, we exercise our discretion so that this matter may be decided on the merits and not on default.

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.


I concur I concur I concur

Decision Date: April 02, 2019



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Chevalier v. 368 E. 148th Street Associates, LLC
80 A.D.3d 411 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Harrelson v. Jackson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harrelson-v-jackson-nyappterm-2019.