Harrelson v. City of Clinton

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Harrelson v. City of Clinton

1930 OK CR 267, 288 P. 1116, 48 Okla. Crim. 23, 1930 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 15

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided June 5, 1930·No. No. A-7379.·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error was convicted in the police court of the city of Clinton of the crime of being intoxicated on the streets of said city, and his punishment fixed by the court at a fine of $20.

The appeal in this case was filed in this court on the 20th day of May, 1929. No briefs have been filed on behalf of plaintiff in error, and no appearance was made for oral argument.

Upon careful examination of the record we find no errors depriving the appellant of any substantial rights.

The evidence being sufficient to support the verdict, the cause is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error was convicted in the police court of the city of Clinton of the crime of being intoxicated on the streets of said city, and his punishment fixed by the court at a fine of $20.

The appeal in this case was filed in this court on the 20th day of May, 1929. No briefs have been filed on behalf of plaintiff in error, and no appearance was made for oral argument.

Upon careful examination of the record we find no errors depriving the appellant of any substantial rights.

The evidence being sufficient to support the verdict, the cause is affirmed.

Harrelson v. City of Clinton, 1930 OK CR 267, 288 P. 1116, 48 Okla. Crim. 23, 1930 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 15 (Okla. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

1930 OK CR 267 (Harrelson v. City of Clinton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.