Harrelson v. City of Clinton

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Harrelson v. City of Clinton

1930 OK CR 267, 288 P. 1116, 48 Okla. Crim. 23, 1930 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 15

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedJune 5, 1930

DocketNo. A-7379.

StatusPublished

This text of 1930 OK CR 267 (Harrelson v. City of Clinton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Harrelson v. City of Clinton, 1930 OK CR 267, 288 P. 1116, 48 Okla. Crim. 23, 1930 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 15 (Okla. Ct. App. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error was convicted in the police court of the city of Clinton of the crime of being intoxicated on the streets of said city, and his punishment fixed by the court at a fine of $20.

The appeal in this case was filed in this court on the 20th day of May, 1929. No briefs have been filed on behalf of plaintiff in error, and no appearance was made for oral argument.

Upon careful examination of the record we find no errors depriving the appellant of any substantial rights.

The evidence being sufficient to support the verdict, the cause is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error was convicted in the police court of the city of Clinton of the crime of being intoxicated on the streets of said city, and his punishment fixed by the court at a fine of $20.

The appeal in this case was filed in this court on the 20th day of May, 1929. No briefs have been filed on behalf of plaintiff in error, and no appearance was made for oral argument.

Upon careful examination of the record we find no errors depriving the appellant of any substantial rights.

The evidence being sufficient to support the verdict, the cause is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1930 OK CR 267, 288 P. 1116, 48 Okla. Crim. 23, 1930 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 15, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harrelson-v-city-of-clinton-oklacrimapp-1930.