Harrell v. . White

181 S.E. 268, 208 N.C. 409, 1935 N.C. LEXIS 427
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedSeptember 18, 1935
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 181 S.E. 268 (Harrell v. . White) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Harrell v. . White, 181 S.E. 268, 208 N.C. 409, 1935 N.C. LEXIS 427 (N.C. 1935).

Opinion

Stacy, O. J.

The situation presented by the record in this case is identical with that appearing in the case of Smith v. Texas Co., 200 *410 N. C., 39, 156 S. E., 160. There, the transcript contained no grouping o£ exceptions or assignments of error as required by Rule 19 (3) of the Rules of Practice in the Supreme Court. 200 N. C., 824. It was said that upon motion of appellee the appeal would be dismissed or the judgment affirmed. The same may be repeated here.

The judgment will be affirmed on authority of the Smith case. See converse of proposition in Jenkins v. Castelloe, ante, 406.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Eno Investment Co. v. Protective Chemicals Laboratory, Inc.
63 S.E.2d 637 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1951)
Steelman v. . Benfield
46 S.E.2d 829 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1948)
Wilson v. . Robinson
32 S.E.2d 601 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1945)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
181 S.E. 268, 208 N.C. 409, 1935 N.C. LEXIS 427, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harrell-v-white-nc-1935.