Harrell v. Taylor

100 S.E. 724, 24 Ga. App. 288, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 575
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedOctober 20, 1919
Docket10330
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 100 S.E. 724 (Harrell v. Taylor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Harrell v. Taylor, 100 S.E. 724, 24 Ga. App. 288, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 575 (Ga. Ct. App. 1919).

Opinion

Stephens, J.

1. The alleged defect in the affidavit for attachment being one that may be cured by amendment, and no exception thereto having been taken in the court below, it can not be considered here.

2. There was some evidence to support the verdict, and the motion for a new trial being based on the general grounds only, the court did not err in overruling the motion.

Judgment affirmed.

Jerilcins, P. J., and Smith, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

May v. Lee
197 S.E. 50 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1938)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
100 S.E. 724, 24 Ga. App. 288, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 575, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harrell-v-taylor-gactapp-1919.