Harrell v. Taylor

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Harrell v. Taylor

100 S.E. 724, 24 Ga. App. 288, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 575

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided October 20, 1919·No. 10330·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Stephens, J.

1. The alleged defect in the affidavit for attachment being one that may be cured by amendment, and no exception thereto having been taken in the court below, it can not be considered here.

2. There was some evidence to support the verdict, and the motion for a new trial being based on the general grounds only, the court did not err in overruling the motion.

Judgment affirmed.

Jerilcins, P. J., and Smith, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Stephens, J.

1. The alleged defect in the affidavit for attachment being one that may be cured by amendment, and no exception thereto having been taken in the court below, it can not be considered here.

2. There was some evidence to support the verdict, and the motion for a new trial being based on the general grounds only, the court did not err in overruling the motion.

Judgment affirmed.

Jerilcins, P. J., and Smith, J., concur.

Harrell v. Taylor, 100 S.E. 724, 24 Ga. App. 288, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 575 (Ga. Ct. App. 1919).

Pincite

100 S.E. 724 (Harrell v. Taylor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related