Harrell v. State

108 S.E.2d 864, 215 Ga. 56, 1959 Ga. LEXIS 390
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided May 8, 1959·No. 20437·Published

Opinion

Head, Justice.

There was no service of the bill of exceptions. The only waiver or acknowledgment of service was in connection with the presentation of the bill of exceptions to the trial judge for certification, and this waiver is in identical language (with the exception of the name and the date) as that in Scott v. State, 214 Ga. 860 (108 S. E. 2d 692). Under the ruling in Scott v. State, supra, and the decisions there cited, [57] the writ of error must be dismissed. See also Tanner v. State, 214 Ga. 859 (108 S. E. 2d 703).

Submitted April 14, 1959 Decided May 8, 1959. R. E. Lawson, J. Laddie Boatright, for plaintiff in error. Dewey Hayes, Solicitor-General, Eugene Cook, Attorney-General, Rubye G. Jackson, Deputy Assistant Attorney-General, contra.

Writ of error dismissed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harrell v. State, 108 S.E.2d 864, 215 Ga. 56, 1959 Ga. LEXIS 390 (Ga. 1959).

108 S.E.2d 864 (Harrell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Scott v. State
108 S.E.2d 692 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1959)
Tanner v. State
108 S.E.2d 703 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1959)