Home/Supreme Court of Georgia/Harrell v. State

Harrell v. State

108 S.E.2d 864, 215 Ga. 56, 1959 Ga. LEXIS 390
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedMay 8, 1959
Docket20437
StatusPublished

This text of 108 S.E.2d 864 (Harrell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Harrell v. State, 108 S.E.2d 864, 215 Ga. 56, 1959 Ga. LEXIS 390 (Ga. 1959).

Opinion

Head, Justice.

There was no service of the bill of exceptions. The only waiver or acknowledgment of service was in connection with the presentation of the bill of exceptions to the trial judge for certification, and this waiver is in identical language (with the exception of the name and the date) as that in Scott v. State, 214 Ga. 860 (108 S. E. 2d 692). Under the ruling in Scott v. State, supra, and the decisions there cited, [57]*57the writ of error must be dismissed. See also Tanner v. State, 214 Ga. 859 (108 S. E. 2d 703).

Submitted April 14, 1959 Decided May 8, 1959. R. E. Lawson, J. Laddie Boatright, for plaintiff in error. Dewey Hayes, Solicitor-General, Eugene Cook, Attorney-General, Rubye G. Jackson, Deputy Assistant Attorney-General, contra.

Writ of error dismissed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Scott v. State
108 S.E.2d 692 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1959)
Tanner v. State
108 S.E.2d 703 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1959)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
108 S.E.2d 864, 215 Ga. 56, 1959 Ga. LEXIS 390, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harrell-v-state-ga-1959.