Harrell v. State

728 So. 2d 284, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 1281, 1999 WL 68907
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 10, 1999
DocketNo. 98-490
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 728 So. 2d 284 (Harrell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Harrell v. State, 728 So. 2d 284, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 1281, 1999 WL 68907 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We find no merit in the appellant’s argument that the show-up identification was defective. See Grant v. State, 390 So.2d 341 (Fla.1980). Notwithstanding the appellant’s argument to the contrary, the state’s evidence prior to the show-up identification was clearly sufficient to establish probable cause in support of the appellant’s arrest so that even if we were to find merit in the appellant’s argument, it would not taint the rest of the state’s evidence. See State v. DiGuilio, 491 So.2d 1129 (Fla.1986). See also State v. Cortez, 705 So.2d 676 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wade v. State
728 So. 2d 284 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
728 So. 2d 284, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 1281, 1999 WL 68907, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harrell-v-state-fladistctapp-1999.