Harrell v. State
308 So. 2d 51
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 14, 1975·No. No. 74-809·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Appellant’s arguments on appeal are without merit. However, it appears the sentencing of sixty days in jail, with thirty days thereof suspended, followed by two years probation was contrary to Fla.Stat. § 948.01(4) (1973). Consequently, the cause is hereby remanded for resentencing in accordance with the rationale of Hults v. State, Fla.App .2d, 1975, 307 So.2d 489.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Harrell v. State, 308 So. 2d 51 (Fla. Ct. App. 1975).
308 So. 2d 51 (Harrell v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Jones
327 So. 2d 18 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1976)
Woodruff v. State
309 So. 2d 55 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1975)