Harrell v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Harrell v. State

245 So. 2d 302, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 6911

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 16, 1971

DocketNo. N-142

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 245 So. 2d 302 (Harrell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Harrell v. State, 245 So. 2d 302, 1971 Fla. App. LEXIS 6911 (Fla. Ct. App. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a manslaughter conviction and ten-year sentence thereon. The evidence was conflicting as to who the aggressor was in the affray which resulted in a homicide. The rule is well settled that the jury is the trier of fact and that when the jury’s verdict is supported by competent substantial evidence, the appellate court will not substitute its judgment for that of the jury. Kellogg v. State, 219 So.2d 745 (Fla.App.1969).

Numerous points have been raised by appellant, but our consideration of them fails to convince us that reversible error was committed in the trial of this cause.

Accordingly, the judgment reviewed herein must be

Affirmed.

WIGGINTON, Acting C. J., and RAWLS and SPECTOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI