Harrell v. Southeastern Pipe-Line Co.

10 S.E.2d 386, 190 Ga. 709, 1940 Ga. LEXIS 552
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJune 21, 1940
Docket13296.
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 10 S.E.2d 386 (Harrell v. Southeastern Pipe-Line Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Harrell v. Southeastern Pipe-Line Co., 10 S.E.2d 386, 190 Ga. 709, 1940 Ga. LEXIS 552 (Ga. 1940).

Opinions

Jenkins, Justice.

These exceptions by property owners to the refusal of an injunction against condemnation proceedings by the defendant pipeline company, to obtain a right of way for the transportation of gasoline and petroleum products, are controlled by the decision in the case of Botts v. Southeastern Pipe-Line Co., 190 Ga. 689 (9 S. E. 2d, ). Accordingly, it was error to refuse an interlocutory injunction.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

St. Andrews Public Service District Commission v. Commissioners of Public Works
344 S.E.2d 857 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 1986)
Harrison v. Arogeti
183 S.E.2d 761 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1971)
Robinson v. Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp.
306 F. Supp. 201 (N.D. Georgia, 1969)
McGreggor v. W. L. Florence Construction Co.
65 S.E.2d 809 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1951)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
10 S.E.2d 386, 190 Ga. 709, 1940 Ga. LEXIS 552, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harrell-v-southeastern-pipe-line-co-ga-1940.