Harrell v. Rivera
This text of Harrell v. Rivera (Harrell v. Rivera) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-8105
DAVID HARRELL,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
MILDRED L. RIVERA, Warden FCI Estill,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. David C. Norton, District Judge. (3:07-cv-02710-DCN)
Submitted: January 15, 2009 Decided: January 26, 2009
Before MOTZ and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
David Harrell, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murcier Bowens, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
David Harrell, a federal prisoner, appeals the
district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the
magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241
(2006) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Harrell v. Rivera, No. 3:07-cv-02710-DCN
(D.S.C. Sept. 3, 2008). We grant Harrell’s motion to proceed in
forma pauperis and dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Harrell v. Rivera, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harrell-v-rivera-ca4-2009.