Harrell v. Norfolk & Carolina Railroad

29 S.E. 56, 122 N.C. 822, 1898 N.C. LEXIS 359
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedFebruary 22, 1898
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 29 S.E. 56 (Harrell v. Norfolk & Carolina Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Harrell v. Norfolk & Carolina Railroad, 29 S.E. 56, 122 N.C. 822, 1898 N.C. LEXIS 359 (N.C. 1898).

Opinion

Faircloth, 0. J.:

This action, begun September 26, 1894, is brought to recover damages by reason of defendant’s construction of its road across plaintiff’s land, and thereby backing water and sobbing his cleared land. The road was completed in 1889 the defendant urges that “all the injury” resulted simultaneously with the completion of its road, and that being so, the Statute of Limitations began to run from that time, and its .only exception is that his Honor refused to so charge the jury.

The evidence is that the land has beeh all the time and still is sobbed with back-water. This question was decided in Nichols v. Railroad, 120 N. C., 495, to which the profession is referred for the reason.

The action was for permanent damages. The Acts of 1895, Chapter 224, was passed since this action was instituted. ■

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ridley v. Seaboard & Roanoke Railroad
32 S.E. 325 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1899)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
29 S.E. 56, 122 N.C. 822, 1898 N.C. LEXIS 359, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harrell-v-norfolk-carolina-railroad-nc-1898.