Harrell v. New York City Housing Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Harrell v. New York City Housing Authority

300 A.D.2d 54, 750 N.Y.S.2d 501, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11735

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 5, 2002

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 300 A.D.2d 54 (Harrell v. New York City Housing Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Harrell v. New York City Housing Authority, 300 A.D.2d 54, 750 N.Y.S.2d 501, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11735 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Walter Tolub, J.), entered July 10, 2001, which dismissed the petition brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 to annul respondents’ determination terminating petitioner’s employment as a caretaker with respondent New York City Housing Authority, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Petitioner chose to challenge respondent Housing Authority’s termination of his employment through proceedings with the Civil Service Commission, and, inasmuch as the Civil Service Commission’s affirmance of the challenged determination offends neither constitutional nor statutory authority, it is final and binding (see Civil Service Law § 76 [3]; Matter of New York City Dept. of Envtl. Protection v New York City Civ. Serv. Commn., 78 NY2d 318). Concur — Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Buckley, Sullivan and Lerner, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Walter Tolub, J.), entered July 10, 2001, which dismissed the petition brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 to annul respondents’ determination terminating petitioner’s employment as a caretaker with respondent New York City Housing Authority, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Petitioner chose to challenge respondent Housing Authority’s termination of his employment through proceedings with the Civil Service Commission, and, inasmuch as the Civil Service Commission’s affirmance of the challenged determination offends neither constitutional nor statutory authority, it is final and binding (see Civil Service Law § 76 [3]; Matter of New York City Dept. of Envtl. Protection v New York City Civ. Serv. Commn., 78 NY2d 318). Concur — Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Buckley, Sullivan and Lerner, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

300 A.D.2d 54, 750 N.Y.S.2d 501, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11735, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harrell-v-new-york-city-housing-authority-nyappdiv-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack