Harrell v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Harrell v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.

204 A.D.2d 546, 614 N.Y.S.2d 196

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 16, 1994·Published

Opinion

—In a proceeding pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-e (5), the appeal is from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Clemente, J.), dated March 19, 1992, which, upon reargument, granted the infant-petitioner’s motion for leave to serve a late notice of claim.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

We find that the Supreme Court properly granted the infant-petitioner leave to serve a late notice of claim. We note that the application of the copetitioner Darie Franklin for similar relief was previously withdrawn. Miller, J. P., Altman, Goldstein and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a proceeding pursuant to General Municipal Law § 50-e (5), the appeal is from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Clemente, J.), dated March 19, 1992, which, upon reargument, granted the infant-petitioner’s motion for leave to serve a late notice of claim.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

We find that the Supreme Court properly granted the infant-petitioner leave to serve a late notice of claim. We note that the application of the copetitioner Darie Franklin for similar relief was previously withdrawn. Miller, J. P., Altman, Goldstein and Florio, JJ., concur.

Harrell v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp., 204 A.D.2d 546, 614 N.Y.S.2d 196 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

204 A.D.2d 546 (Harrell v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related