Harrell v. Lister

114 S.E. 77, 29 Ga. App. 150, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 122
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided October 5, 1922·No. 13358·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Bloodworti-i, J.

Trover not being maintainable by one without title to the property or the right of possession, and it not appearing in this case that either title or the right of possession was in the plaintiff, a verdict for him was without evidence to support it. Palmour v. Durham Fertilizer Co., 97 Ga. 244 (2) (22 S. E. 931); Dudley v. Isler, 21 Ga. App. 615 (3) (94 S. E. 827), and cases cited.

Judgment reversed.

Broyles, C. J., and Lulce, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harrell v. Lister, 114 S.E. 77, 29 Ga. App. 150, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 122 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).

114 S.E. 77 (Harrell v. Lister) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smith v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
79 S.E.2d 7 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1953)
Smith v. R. F. Brodegaard & Co.
49 S.E.2d 500 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1948)
Livingston v. Epsten-Roberts Co.
177 S.E. 79 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1934)