Harrell v. Lillie
This text of 19 F. App'x 595 (Harrell v. Lillie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Peter T. Harrell appeals pro se the district court’s judgment after a bench trial in favor of defendants in his action brought pursuant 42 U.S.C. § 1983 with pendent state law claims. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291.
Because Harrell did not provide a transcript of the trial, this court cannot properly review this case on appeal. We therefore dismiss the appeal. See Syncom Capital Corp. v. Wade, 924 F.2d 167, 169 (9th Cir.1991).
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
19 F. App'x 595, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harrell-v-lillie-ca9-2001.