Harrell v. Harrell

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Harrell v. Harrell

403 So. 2d 589, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 20998

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 11, 1981

DocketNo. XX-89

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 403 So. 2d 589 (Harrell v. Harrell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Harrell v. Harrell, 403 So. 2d 589, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 20998 (Fla. Ct. App. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The wife appeals the order of the trial judge dissolving the marriage of the parties. We affirm on all points except the award of rehabilitative alimony. Based on our opinion in Golden v. Golden, 395 So.2d 1255 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981), we find that the trial judge abused his discretion in failing to award permanent alimony. The parties had been married for eighteen years, the wife had not worked outside the home since the birth of the parties’ second child except to assist in the husband’s business without compensation, and she is presently medically unfit to be employed. The wife took care of the family home and the parties’ children while the husband pursued successful business and political careers. We therefore REVERSE the award of rehabilitative alimony with directions to convert the award of $1,000 per month rehabilitative alimony to an award of $1,000 per month permanent periodic alimony.

McCORD and SHIVERS, JJ., and LILES, WOODIE A. (Retired), Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The wife appeals the order of the trial judge dissolving the marriage of the parties. We affirm on all points except the award of rehabilitative alimony. Based on our opinion in Golden v. Golden, 395 So.2d 1255 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981), we find that the trial judge abused his discretion in failing to award permanent alimony. The parties had been married for eighteen years, the wife had not worked outside the home since the birth of the parties’ second child except to assist in the husband’s business without compensation, and she is presently medically unfit to be employed. The wife took care of the family home and the parties’ children while the husband pursued successful business and political careers. We therefore REVERSE the award of rehabilitative alimony with directions to convert the award of $1,000 per month rehabilitative alimony to an award of $1,000 per month permanent periodic alimony.

McCORD and SHIVERS, JJ., and LILES, WOODIE A. (Retired), Associate Judge, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

403 So. 2d 589, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 20998, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harrell-v-harrell-fladistctapp-1981.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack