Harrell v. Garner
This text of 161 So. 2d 892 (Harrell v. Garner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This cause having been orally argued before the court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court hereby appealed is affirmed. With regard to the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict and judgment, see Beikirch v. City of Jacksonville Beach (Fla.App.1964) 159 So.2d 898. With regard to the defense of assumption of risk, see Henley v. Carter et al. (Fla.1953) 63 So.2d 192. As to applicability of guest statute, see Hale v. Adams (Fla.App.1960) 117 So.2d 524; (Fla.App.1962) 138 So.2d 761.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
161 So. 2d 892, 1964 Fla. App. LEXIS 4594, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harrell-v-garner-fladistctapp-1964.