Harrell v. Garner

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Harrell v. Garner

161 So. 2d 892, 1964 Fla. App. LEXIS 4594

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 19, 1964·No. No. E-423·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before the court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court hereby appealed is affirmed. With regard to the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict and judgment, see Beikirch v. City of Jacksonville Beach (Fla.App.1964) 159 So.2d 898. With regard to the defense of assumption of risk, see Henley v. Carter et al. (Fla.1953) 63 So.2d 192. As to applicability of guest statute, see Hale v. Adams (Fla.App.1960) 117 So.2d 524; (Fla.App.1962) 138 So.2d 761.

STURGIS, C. J, and WIGGINTON and RAWLS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before the court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court hereby appealed is affirmed. With regard to the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict and judgment, see Beikirch v. City of Jacksonville Beach (Fla.App.1964) 159 So.2d 898. With regard to the defense of assumption of risk, see Henley v. Carter et al. (Fla.1953) 63 So.2d 192. As to applicability of guest statute, see Hale v. Adams (Fla.App.1960) 117 So.2d 524; (Fla.App.1962) 138 So.2d 761.

STURGIS, C. J, and WIGGINTON and RAWLS, JJ., concur.

Harrell v. Garner, 161 So. 2d 892, 1964 Fla. App. LEXIS 4594 (Fla. Ct. App. 1964).

Pincite

161 So. 2d 892 (Harrell v. Garner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related