Harrell v. Garner

161 So. 2d 892, 1964 Fla. App. LEXIS 4594
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 19, 1964
DocketNo. E-423
StatusPublished

This text of 161 So. 2d 892 (Harrell v. Garner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Harrell v. Garner, 161 So. 2d 892, 1964 Fla. App. LEXIS 4594 (Fla. Ct. App. 1964).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause having been orally argued before the court, the briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the judgment of the lower court hereby appealed is affirmed. With regard to the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict and judgment, see Beikirch v. City of Jacksonville Beach (Fla.App.1964) 159 So.2d 898. With regard to the defense of assumption of risk, see Henley v. Carter et al. (Fla.1953) 63 So.2d 192. As to applicability of guest statute, see Hale v. Adams (Fla.App.1960) 117 So.2d 524; (Fla.App.1962) 138 So.2d 761.

STURGIS, C. J, and WIGGINTON and RAWLS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Beikirch v. City of Jacksonville Beach
159 So. 2d 898 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1964)
Hale v. Adams
117 So. 2d 524 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1960)
Henley v. Carter
63 So. 2d 192 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1953)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
161 So. 2d 892, 1964 Fla. App. LEXIS 4594, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harrell-v-garner-fladistctapp-1964.