Harrell v. Decatur County, GA
This text of 41 F.3d 1494 (Harrell v. Decatur County, GA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
concurring:
I agree with this court’s decision to affirm the district court’s grant of summary judgment on the question of qualified immunity for Deputy Morris in his individual capacity for the reasons set forth in Judge Dubina’s dissenting opinion in Harrell, 22 F.3d at 1577-80 and this court’s recent decision in Lassiter v. Alabama A & M University, 28 F.3d 1146 (11th Cir.1994) (en bane). I write separately to emphasize that we affirm the district court’s grant of summary judgment with respect to the claims against Deputy Morris in his official capacity, Sheriff Phillips in his individual and official capacities, Decatur County, and the Decatur County Commissioners because of our determination that Harrell was not deprived of any constitutional rights for the reasons set forth in Judge Dubina’s dissenting opinion in Harrell, 22 F.3d at 1580-81.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
41 F.3d 1494, 77 Rad. Reg. 2d (P & F) 143, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 410, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harrell-v-decatur-county-ga-ca11-1995.