Harrell v. Currie

Fourth Circuit

Harrell v. Currie

82 F. App'x 85

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 5, 2003·No. No. 03-7527·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Thomas James Harrell appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Harrell v. Currie, No. CA-03-597-5 (E.D.N.C. Sept. 17, 2003). We dis[86] pense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Thomas James Harrell appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Harrell v. Currie, No. CA-03-597-5 (E.D.N.C. Sept. 17, 2003). We dis[86] pense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Harrell v. Currie, 82 F. App'x 85 (4th Cir. 2003).

Pincite

82 F. App'x 85 (Harrell v. Currie) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related