Harrell v. Cronin

76 S.E.2d 624, 209 Ga. 877, 1953 Ga. LEXIS 430
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided July 13, 1953·No. No. 18266·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Almand, Justice.

The allegations in the present petition by a father to

modify a decree awarding the minor children to the mother, so as to allow the father the right of visitation, were insufficient to set forth a change of facts and circumstances occurring since the date of the decree, which affected the interest and welfare of the children; and, accordingly, the trial judge did not err in sustaining the general demurrer interposed by the mother and in dismissing the petition to modify. Scott v. Scott, 154 Ga. 659, 661 (115 S. E. 2); Sells v. Sells, 172 Ga. 911 (1) (159 S. E. 237); Shields v. Bodenhamer, 180 Ga. 122 (178 S. E. 294); Fuller v. Fuller, 197 Ga. 719 (3) (30 S. E. 2d, 600); Pope v. Pope, 209 Ga. 326 (72 S. E. 2d, 308).

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Atkinson, P. J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harrell v. Cronin, 76 S.E.2d 624, 209 Ga. 877, 1953 Ga. LEXIS 430 (Ga. 1953).

76 S.E.2d 624 (Harrell v. Cronin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Everly v. Everly
159 S.E.2d 78 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1968)