Harrell v. Cronin
This text of 76 S.E.2d 624 (Harrell v. Cronin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The allegations in the present petition by a father to
modify a decree awarding the minor children to the mother, so as to allow the father the right of visitation, were insufficient to set forth a change of facts and circumstances occurring since the date of the decree, which affected the interest and welfare of the children; and, accordingly, the trial judge did not err in sustaining the general demurrer interposed by the mother and in dismissing the petition to modify. Scott v. Scott, 154 Ga. 659, 661 (115 S. E. 2); Sells v. Sells, 172 Ga. 911 (1) (159 S. E. 237); Shields v. Bodenhamer, 180 Ga. 122 (178 S. E. 294); Fuller v. Fuller, 197 Ga. 719 (3) (30 S. E. 2d, 600); Pope v. Pope, 209 Ga. 326 (72 S. E. 2d, 308).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
76 S.E.2d 624, 209 Ga. 877, 1953 Ga. LEXIS 430, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harrell-v-cronin-ga-1953.