Harrell v. Comm'r
This text of 2006 T.C. Summary Opinion 141 (Harrell v. Comm'r) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Tax Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
*43 PURSUANT TO INTERNAL REVENUE CODE SECTION 7463(b), THIS OPINION MAY NOT BE TREATED AS PRECEDENT FOR ANY OTHER CASE.
RUWE, Judge: This case was heard pursuant to section 7463 1 in effect when the petition was filed. The decision to be entered is not reviewable by any other court, and this opinion should not be cited as authority.
Respondent determined deficiencies in petitioner's Federal income taxes of $ 1,755 in 2002 and $ 1,500 in 2003. The only issue for decision is whether petitioner is entitled to itemized deductions for charitable contributions of $ 6,500 for 2002 and $ 6,000 for 2003.
Some facts have been stipulated and are so found. The stipulation of facts and the attached exhibits are incorporated by this*44 reference. When the petition was filed, petitioner resided in Wilmington, Delaware.
Respondent received petitioner's electronically filed Federal income tax returns for 2002 and 2003 on May 21, 2003, and April 30, 2004, respectively. Petitioner's returns were prepared by Chester Muhammad. Petitioner claimed itemized deductions for charitable contributions of $ 6,500 and $ 6,000 for 2002 and 2003, respectively.
During the examination of petitioner's returns, petitioner submitted computer-generated lists which show weekly cash charitable contributions to Faith Tabernacle Church (the church) of $ 125 per week for 2002 (totaling $ 6,500) and $ 115 per week for 2003, except for one week which shows $ 135 (totaling $ 6,000). Petitioner subsequently submitted revised lists which show the amount of weekly contributions made to Faith Tabernacle Baptist Church 2 for 2002 and 2003. The revised list for 2002 shows weekly contributions broken down as, Tithes-$ 100, Pastor's Offering-$ 20, and Utilities Fund-$ 5. The revised list for 2003 shows weekly contributions broken down as, Tithes-$ 90 and Pastor's Offering-$ 25, except that for one week it shows Tithes$ 100, Pastor's Offering-$ 20, and*45 Utilities Fund- $ 15. Respondent determined that neither list is a reliable written record sufficient to substantiate petitioner's claimed charitable contributions. Petitioner's original and revised lists were neither dated nor signed by a representative of the church. Petitioner's lists were written with the help of his tax preparer, Chester Muhammad, with information provided by petitioner.
Petitioner had a checking account in 2002 and 2003, but made no contributions by check.
Discussion
As a general rule, the Commissioner's determinations set forth in a notice of deficiency are presumed correct, and the taxpayer bears the burden of proving that these determinations are in error.
Deductions are strictly a matter of legislative grace and the taxpayer bears the burden of proving entitlement to the claimed deduction.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2006 T.C. Summary Opinion 141, 2006 Tax Ct. Summary LEXIS 43, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harrell-v-commr-tax-2006.