Harrell v. CNA Insurance Companies

86 F. App'x 579
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 2, 2004·No. 03-1698·Unpublished·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Leon Harrell appeals the district court’s orders denying his disability claim under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001-1168 (2000), his request for sanctions under 29 U.S.C. § 1132, his requests for attorneys’ fees and costs, and his request for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court in its various orders. See Harrell v. CNA Insurance Co., No. CA-99-292-4-12 (D.S.C. filed Jan 15 and entered Jan. 16, 2003; Jan. 21, 2003; May 14, 2003; May 15, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harrell v. CNA Insurance Companies, 86 F. App'x 579 (4th Cir. 2004).

86 F. App'x 579 (Harrell v. CNA Insurance Companies) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Harrell v. Cna Insurance Cos.
543 U.S. 810 (Supreme Court, 2004)