Harrell v. Brinson

174 S.E.2d 142, 8 N.C. App. 341, 1970 N.C. App. LEXIS 1563
CourtCourt of Appeals of North Carolina
DecidedMay 27, 1970
DocketNo. 703DC293
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 174 S.E.2d 142 (Harrell v. Brinson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Harrell v. Brinson, 174 S.E.2d 142, 8 N.C. App. 341, 1970 N.C. App. LEXIS 1563 (N.C. Ct. App. 1970).

Opinion

BeoCK, J.

Plaintiffs appealed for failure of the trial judge to award punitive damages. Defendant appealed for failure of the trial judge to grant his motion for nonsuit, and for other alleged errors. We do not pass upon the merits of either appeal.

The judgment appealed from was entered 11 December 1969. The Rules of Practice in the Court of Appeals require that the record on appeal be docketed within ninety days after the date of the judgment appealed from, unless for good cause shown the trial tribunal extends the time for docketing for a period not exceeding sixty days. No order extending the time for docketing was entered for either plaintiffs or defendant. The record on appeal should have been docketed in this Court on or before 11 March 1970; it was docketed here on 31 March 1970.

For failure to comply with the Rules we ex mero mo tu dismiss both appeals.

Appeals dismissed.

BRItt and HedricK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Campbell v. McNeil
190 S.E.2d 383 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1972)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
174 S.E.2d 142, 8 N.C. App. 341, 1970 N.C. App. LEXIS 1563, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harrell-v-brinson-ncctapp-1970.