Home/Supreme Court of Georgia/Harrell v. Bank of Leesburg

Harrell v. Bank of Leesburg

127 S.E. 228, 159 Ga. 854, 1925 Ga. LEXIS 68
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 21, 1925
DocketNo. 4259
StatusPublished

This text of 127 S.E. 228 (Harrell v. Bank of Leesburg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Harrell v. Bank of Leesburg, 127 S.E. 228, 159 Ga. 854, 1925 Ga. LEXIS 68 (Ga. 1925).

Opinions

Per Curiam.

The trial judge did not err in granting the interlocutory

injunction and appointing the receiver, under the pleadings and evidence. Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. B. B. Forrester, W. G. Martin, and Lippitt & Burt, for plaintiffs in error. Pottle & Hofmayer, F. L. Forrester and Pope <& Bennet, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
127 S.E. 228, 159 Ga. 854, 1925 Ga. LEXIS 68, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harrell-v-bank-of-leesburg-ga-1925.