Harrell v. Bank of Leesburg

127 S.E. 228, 159 Ga. 854, 1925 Ga. LEXIS 68
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided February 21, 1925·No. No. 4259·Published

Opinions

Per Curiam.

The trial judge did not err in granting the interlocutory

injunction and appointing the receiver, under the pleadings and evidence. Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. B. B. Forrester, W. G. Martin, and Lippitt & Burt, for plaintiffs in error. Pottle & Hofmayer, F. L. Forrester and Pope <& Bennet, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harrell v. Bank of Leesburg, 127 S.E. 228, 159 Ga. 854, 1925 Ga. LEXIS 68 (Ga. 1925).

127 S.E. 228 (Harrell v. Bank of Leesburg) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.