Harragin v. Christman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Harragin v. Christman

18 A.D.2d 672, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6482

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 10, 1962

StatusPublished

This text of 18 A.D.2d 672 (Harragin v. Christman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Harragin v. Christman, 18 A.D.2d 672, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6482 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1962).

Pincite

Opinion

In an negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, medical expense and loss of services, the defendant appeals as follows: (1) from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Putnam County, entered October 27, 1961 after trial, upon a jury’s verdict of $30,000 in favor of the female plaintiff and $2,500 in favor of the male plaintiff; (2) an order of said court, entered November 17, 1961 which denied defendant’s motion to set aside the verdict and for a new trial under section 549 of the Civil Practice Act; and (3) an order, of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated March 8, 1962 (and entered in Putnam County on March 13, 1962), which denied defendant’s motion for a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence. Judgment and orders affirmed, with one bill of costs. No opinion. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Brennan, Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, medical expense and loss of services, the defendant appeals as follows: (1) from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Putnam County, entered October 27, 1961 after trial, upon a jury’s verdict of $30,000 in favor of the female plaintiff and $2,500 in favor of the male plaintiff; (2) an order of said court, entered November 17, 1961 which denied defendant’s motion to set aside the verdict and for a new trial under section 549 of the Civil Practice Act; and (3) an order, of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated March 8, 1962 (and entered in Putnam County on March 13, 1962), which denied defendant’s motion for a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence. Judgment and orders affirmed, with one bill of costs. No opinion. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Brennan, Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

18 A.D.2d 672, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6482, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harragin-v-christman-nyappdiv-1962.