Harr v. Wright
250 A.D. 830, 296 N.Y.S. 463, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9193
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 24, 1937
StatusPublished
This text of 250 A.D. 830 (Harr v. Wright) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Harr v. Wright, 250 A.D. 830, 296 N.Y.S. 463, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9193 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).
Opinion
Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. All concur. (The order denies motion to dismiss the complaint in an action by representative of a bank to recover unpaid balance due on subscription for capital stock.) Present —■ Edgeomb, Thompson, Crosby, Lewis and Cunningham, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
250 A.D. 830, 296 N.Y.S. 463, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9193, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harr-v-wright-nyappdiv-1937.