Harr

203 Ct. Cl. 731, 1973 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 180, 1973 WL 5075
CourtUnited States Court of Claims
DecidedDecember 14, 1973
DocketNo. 208-73
StatusPublished

This text of 203 Ct. Cl. 731 (Harr) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Harr, 203 Ct. Cl. 731, 1973 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 180, 1973 WL 5075 (cc 1973).

Opinion

Court of Claims jurisdication; tort claim. — On December 14,1973 the court issued the following order:

“This case comes before the court on defendant’s motion for summary judgment on plaintiff’s petition. The court does not consider this an appropriate case for summary judgment under Eule 101, but,

“it is ordered that the petition be and the same is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Court of Claims Eule 102(b) for failure to comply with the rules of the court and pursuant to Eule 35 for failure to file an appropriate petition.

“rr is further ordered that, to the extent the alleged petition describes a cause of action, it is deemed to be a tort and not within the jurisdiction of this court; 28 U.S.C. § 1491; Basso v. United States, 239 U.S. 602 (1916); Algonac Mfg. Co. v. United States, 192 Ct. Cl. 649, 663, 428 F. 2d 1241, 1249 (1970) ; McCreery v. United States, 161 Ct. Cl. 484 (1963).”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Basso v. United States
239 U.S. 602 (Supreme Court, 1916)
McCreery v. United States
161 Ct. Cl. 484 (Court of Claims, 1963)
Algonac Manufacturing Co. v. United States
428 F.2d 1241 (Court of Claims, 1970)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
203 Ct. Cl. 731, 1973 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 180, 1973 WL 5075, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harr-cc-1973.