Harpman v. . Eighth Avenue Railroad Company
139 N.E. 721, 235 N.Y. 528, 1923 N.Y. LEXIS 1241
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
■ Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Hogan, Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin, Crane and Andrews, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Harpman v. . Eighth Avenue Railroad Company, 139 N.E. 721, 235 N.Y. 528, 1923 N.Y. LEXIS 1241 (N.Y. 1923).
139 N.E. 721 (Harpman v. . Eighth Avenue Railroad Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.