Harper v. Wieking
202 F. App'x 274
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
We have reviewed appellant’s response to this court’s order to show cause, and we conclude that the questions raised in this [275]*275appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard).
Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court’s judgment.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Harper v. Wieking, 202 F. App'x 274 (9th Cir. 2006).
202 F. App'x 274 (Harper v. Wieking) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States v. James Lynn Hooton
693 F.2d 857 (Ninth Circuit, 1982)