Harper v. Whyte
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
A review of the record, the opening brief, and appellant’s response to the order to show cause indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard).
Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court’s judgment dismissing the complaint without leave to amend.
All pending motions are denied.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
283 F. App'x 459 (Harper v. Whyte) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.