Harper v. Thurnher

United States Court of Military Appeals

Harper v. Thurnher

22 C.M.A. 657

CourtUnited States Court of Military Appeals

DecidedJune 25, 1973

DocketNo. 73-32

StatusPublished

This text of 22 C.M.A. 657 (Harper v. Thurnher) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Military Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Harper v. Thurnher, 22 C.M.A. 657 (cma 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

On consideration of the "Petition for Extraordinary Relief in the Nature of a Writ of Mandamus,” filed in the above-entitled action, it is, by the Court, this 25th day of June 1973,

ORDERED:

That said petition be, and the same hereby is, dismissed. Bumpus v. Thurnher, Miscellaneous Docket No. 73-31, June 25, 1973.

Chief Judge Darden would dismiss the petition for the relief sought is not in aid of this Court’s jurisdiction. Judge Duncan would order the respondents to show cause why the relief sought should not be granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

On consideration of the "Petition for Extraordinary Relief in the Nature of a Writ of Mandamus,” filed in the above-entitled action, it is, by the Court, this 25th day of June 1973,

ORDERED:

That said petition be, and the same hereby is, dismissed. Bumpus v. Thurnher, Miscellaneous Docket No. 73-31, June 25, 1973.

Chief Judge Darden would dismiss the petition for the relief sought is not in aid of this Court’s jurisdiction. Judge Duncan would order the respondents to show cause why the relief sought should not be granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

22 C.M.A. 657, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harper-v-thurnher-cma-1973.