Harper v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Harper v. State

257 S.W. 1102, 96 Tex. Crim. 429, 1924 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 74

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided January 30, 1924·No. No. 8314.·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The offense is the unlawful transportation of intoxicating liquor; punishment fixed at confinement in . the penitentiary for a period of one year.

No facts are brought forward for review.

An exception was taken to the sufficiency of the indictment upon the ground that it failed to contain an averment that the intoxicating *430 liquor was transported for sale. Such an averment was not necessary. See Crowley v. State, 92 Texas Crim. Rep., 103; Johnson v. State, 93 Texas Crim. Rep., 150.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The offense is the unlawful transportation of intoxicating liquor; punishment fixed at confinement in . the penitentiary for a period of one year.

No facts are brought forward for review.

An exception was taken to the sufficiency of the indictment upon the ground that it failed to contain an averment that the intoxicating *430 liquor was transported for sale. Such an averment was not necessary. See Crowley v. State, 92 Texas Crim. Rep., 103; Johnson v. State, 93 Texas Crim. Rep., 150.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Harper v. State, 257 S.W. 1102, 96 Tex. Crim. 429, 1924 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 74 (Tex. 1924).

Pincite

257 S.W. 1102 (Harper v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related