Harper v. State
140 N.E. 364, 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 80, 106 Ohio St. 481, 1922 Ohio LEXIS 236
Opinion
1. Under Section 13659, General Code, the defendant in a criminal prosecution may be cross-examined as to his conviction of crime under state or federal laws.
2. His conviction under a city ordinance is not competent. (Coble v. State, 31 Ohio St., 100, approved and followed.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Harper v. State, 140 N.E. 364, 1 Ohio Law. Abs. 80, 106 Ohio St. 481, 1922 Ohio LEXIS 236 (Ohio 1922).
140 N.E. 364 (Harper v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Lanier
2019 Ohio 3213 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2019)
State v. Blacker, Unpublished Decision (10-2-2006)
2006 Ohio 5214 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2006)
State v. Penland
724 N.E.2d 841 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1998)
State v. Kirkland
480 N.E.2d 85 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1984)
Schwartz v. Wells
449 N.E.2d 9 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1982)
State v. Tharp
361 N.E.2d 469 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1976)
State v. Arrington
326 N.E.2d 667 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1975)
State v. Patterson
332 N.E.2d 770 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1974)
Jones v. Haskins
343 F. Supp. 645 (S.D. Ohio, 1971)
State v. Peoples
275 N.E.2d 626 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1971)
State v. McElroy
258 N.E.2d 460 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1970)
State v. Pollard
256 N.E.2d 620 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1970)
James v. Franks
240 N.E.2d 508 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1968)
State v. Woodards
215 N.E.2d 568 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1966)
State v. Reese
192 N.E.2d 791 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1962)
State v. Murdock
172 Ohio St. (N.S.) 221 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1961)
Robert James Smith v. United States
283 F.2d 16 (Sixth Circuit, 1960)
State v. Rodriguez
169 N.E.2d 444 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1959)
State v. Hill
165 N.E.2d 241 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1959)
City of Troy v. Cummins
159 N.E.2d 239 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1958)