Harper v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Harper v. State

163 S.W.3d 529, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 672, 2005 WL 1018434

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 3, 2005·No. ED 85225·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Scott Harper appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing.

We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal. The judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have, however, been provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision in accordance with our local Rule 405. We affirm the judgment under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Scott Harper appeals the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing.

We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal. The judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have, however, been provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision in accordance with our local Rule 405. We affirm the judgment under Rule 84.16(b).

Harper v. State, 163 S.W.3d 529, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 672, 2005 WL 1018434 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

163 S.W.3d 529 (Harper v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.