Harper v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Harper v. State

816 S.E.2d 99

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJune 11, 2018

DocketA16A1008

StatusPublished

This text of 816 S.E.2d 99 (Harper v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Harper v. State, 816 S.E.2d 99 (Ga. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

Andrews, Judge.

In Harper v. State , 338 Ga. App. 535, 790 S.E.2d 552 (2016), we affirmed David Lamar Harper's conviction for criminal trespass pursuant to OCGA § 16-7-21 (a), reversed his conviction for criminal trespass pursuant to OCGA § 16-7-21 (b) (2), vacated the trial court's sentence, and remanded the case to the trial court for resentencing. In State v. Harper , 303 Ga, 144, 810 S.E.2d 484 (2018), the Supreme Court granted certiorari to consider this Court's reversal of Harper's conviction for criminal trespass pursuant to OCGA § 16-7-21 (b) (2), and reversed our judgment on that issue by affirming Harper's conviction for criminal trespass pursuant to OCGA § 16-7-21 (b) (2). Accordingly, the judgment of the Supreme Court is made the judgment of this Court, Harper's convictions for criminal trespass pursuant to OCGA § 16-7-21 (a) and OCGA § 16-7-21 (b) (2) are affirmed, and trial court's sentence for those convictions is reinstated.

Judgment affirmed.

Doyle, P. J., and Ray, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Andrews, Judge.

In Harper v. State , 338 Ga. App. 535, 790 S.E.2d 552 (2016), we affirmed David Lamar Harper's conviction for criminal trespass pursuant to OCGA § 16-7-21 (a), reversed his conviction for criminal trespass pursuant to OCGA § 16-7-21 (b) (2), vacated the trial court's sentence, and remanded the case to the trial court for resentencing. In State v. Harper , 303 Ga, 144, 810 S.E.2d 484 (2018), the Supreme Court granted certiorari to consider this Court's reversal of Harper's conviction for criminal trespass pursuant to OCGA § 16-7-21 (b) (2), and reversed our judgment on that issue by affirming Harper's conviction for criminal trespass pursuant to OCGA § 16-7-21 (b) (2). Accordingly, the judgment of the Supreme Court is made the judgment of this Court, Harper's convictions for criminal trespass pursuant to OCGA § 16-7-21 (a) and OCGA § 16-7-21 (b) (2) are affirmed, and trial court's sentence for those convictions is reinstated.

Judgment affirmed.

Doyle, P. J., and Ray, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

816 S.E.2d 99, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harper-v-state-gactapp-2018.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack