Harper v. State

897 So. 2d 547, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 3939, 2005 WL 670622

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Harper v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 955 So. 2d 617 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 24, 2005·No. No. 1D02-1086·Published

Opinion

On Motion For Rehearing

PER CURIAM.

We deny the appellant’s motion for rehearing but vacate the prior opinion in the case and substitute the following therewith.

AFFIRMED. See Bates v. State, 887 So.2d 1214 (Fla.2004).

KAHN, WEBSTER, and HAWKES, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harper v. State, 897 So. 2d 547, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 3939, 2005 WL 670622 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

897 So. 2d 547 (Harper v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

887 So. 2d 1214 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2004)