Harper v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Harper v. State

592 So. 2d 1175, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 255, 1992 WL 4469

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 15, 1992

DocketNo. 91-3506

StatusPublished

This text of 592 So. 2d 1175 (Harper v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Harper v. State, 592 So. 2d 1175, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 255, 1992 WL 4469 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Ralph Harper, has filed a pro se “Notice of Belated Appeal” to review an order of the trial court summarily denying his Rule 3.850 motion for post-conviction relief.

[1176]*1176We grant the motion to treat the untimely notice of appeal as a belated appeal. Further, having considered the merits of the appeal, we affirm the order of the trial court denying post-conviction relief.

DOWNEY, HERSEY and GARRETT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Ralph Harper, has filed a pro se “Notice of Belated Appeal” to review an order of the trial court summarily denying his Rule 3.850 motion for post-conviction relief.

[1176]*1176We grant the motion to treat the untimely notice of appeal as a belated appeal. Further, having considered the merits of the appeal, we affirm the order of the trial court denying post-conviction relief.

DOWNEY, HERSEY and GARRETT, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

592 So. 2d 1175, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 255, 1992 WL 4469, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harper-v-state-fladistctapp-1992.