Harper v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Harper v. State

594 So. 2d 1196, 1992 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 13, 1992 WL 21013

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Harper v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 676 So. 2d 949 →

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama·Decided January 17, 1992·No. CR-89-3·Published

Opinion

AFTER REMAND FROM THE ALABAMA SUPREME COURT

McMILLAN, Judge.

Pursuant to the Alabama Supreme Court’s holding in Ex parte Harper, 594 So.2d 1181 (Ala.1991), the issue of whether the appellant’s counsel was ineffective should be determined by the trial court. This cause is therefore remanded to the trial court so that it might make that determination. The findings of the trial court should be returned to this Court within 45 days of the date of this opinion.

REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

All the Judges concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

AFTER REMAND FROM THE ALABAMA SUPREME COURT

McMILLAN, Judge.

Pursuant to the Alabama Supreme Court’s holding in Ex parte Harper, 594 So.2d 1181 (Ala.1991), the issue of whether the appellant’s counsel was ineffective should be determined by the trial court. This cause is therefore remanded to the trial court so that it might make that determination. The findings of the trial court should be returned to this Court within 45 days of the date of this opinion.

REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.

All the Judges concur.

Harper v. State, 594 So. 2d 1196, 1992 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 13, 1992 WL 21013 (Ala. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

594 So. 2d 1196 (Harper v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related