Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Harper v. Smith Bros.

Harper v. Smith Bros.

67 S.E. 834, 7 Ga. App. 676, 1910 Ga. App. LEXIS 458
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedApril 19, 1910
Docket2456
StatusPublished

This text of 67 S.E. 834 (Harper v. Smith Bros.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Harper v. Smith Bros., 67 S.E. 834, 7 Ga. App. 676, 1910 Ga. App. LEXIS 458 (Ga. Ct. App. 1910).

Opinion

Rowell, J.

None of the errors of law assigned are meritorious. The evidence practically demanded the verdict.

Judgment affirmed.

Submitted April 14,• Decided April 19, 1910. Newbern é Meeks, H. J. Quineey, for plaintiff in error. Bason <& Bull, B. M. Bryson, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
67 S.E. 834, 7 Ga. App. 676, 1910 Ga. App. LEXIS 458, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harper-v-smith-bros-gactapp-1910.