Harper v. Sievert
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
JENNA HARPER, derivatively on § behalf of T-MOBILE US, INC., § § No. 253, 2024
Plaintiff-Below, Appellant, § § Court Below: Court of Chancery of v. § the State of Delaware §
G. MICHAEL SIEVERT, § C.A. No.: 2022-0819 TIMOTHEUS HÖTTGES, § MARCELO CLAURE, SRIKANT M. § DATAR, SRINIVASAN GOPALAN, § CHRISTIAN P. ILLEK, RAPHAEL § KÜBLER, LETITIA A. LONG, § THORSTEN LANGHEIM, § DOMINIQUE LEROY, TERESA A. § TAYLOR, KELVIN R. § WESTBROOK, BAVAN § HOLLOWAY, MICHAEL WILKENS, § OMAR TAZI, LAWRENCE H. § GUFFEY, AND RONALD FISHER, § §
Defendants-Below, Appellees, § §
and § §
T-MOBILE US, INC., § §
Nominal Defendant-Below, § Appellee. §
Submitted: January 29, 2025 Decided: February 17, 2025
Before SEITZ, Chief Justice; VALIHURA, TRAYNOR, LEGROW, and GRIFFITHS, Justices, constituting the Court en Banc.
ORDER
This 17th day of February, 2025, after careful consideration of the parties’
briefs and the record below, and following oral argument, we find it evident that the
judgment of the Court of Chancery should be affirmed on the basis of and for the
reasons stated in the May 31, 2024 Memorandum Opinion, and the June 12, 2024
Order Granting Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Court of
Chancery is AFFIRMED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Abigail M. LeGrow Justice
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Harper v. Sievert (Harper v. Sievert) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.