Harper v. S. S. Kresge Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Harper v. S. S. Kresge Co.

257 A.D. 903, 12 N.Y.S.2d 155, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8336

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 3, 1939

StatusPublished

This text of 257 A.D. 903 (Harper v. S. S. Kresge Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Harper v. S. S. Kresge Co., 257 A.D. 903, 12 N.Y.S.2d 155, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8336 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1939).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment and order reversed on the facts and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event, unless the plaintiff shall, within ten days, stipulate to reduce the verdict to the sum of $10,000, as of the date of the rendition thereof, in which event the judgment is modified accordingly and, as so modified, is, together with the order, affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. Memorandum: The evidence justified the submissions to the jury and we find no reversible error of law. All concur. (The judgment is for plaintiff in an action for damages for [904]*904personal injuries sustained when receiving a permanent wave at a beauty shop in defendant’s store. The order denies a motion for a new trial.) Present —• Sears, P. J., Lewis, Cunningham, Taylor and Dowling, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment and order reversed on the facts and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event, unless the plaintiff shall, within ten days, stipulate to reduce the verdict to the sum of $10,000, as of the date of the rendition thereof, in which event the judgment is modified accordingly and, as so modified, is, together with the order, affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. Memorandum: The evidence justified the submissions to the jury and we find no reversible error of law. All concur. (The judgment is for plaintiff in an action for damages for [904]*904personal injuries sustained when receiving a permanent wave at a beauty shop in defendant’s store. The order denies a motion for a new trial.) Present —• Sears, P. J., Lewis, Cunningham, Taylor and Dowling, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

257 A.D. 903, 12 N.Y.S.2d 155, 1939 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8336, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harper-v-s-s-kresge-co-nyappdiv-1939.