Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Harper v. Richardson

Harper v. Richardson

199 So. 3d 544, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 13733, 2016 WL 4766084
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 13, 2016·No. No. 1D16-2554·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED. Jensen v. Whetstine, 985 So.2d 1218, 1220 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008) (“An order is not an appealable partial final order where there is a factual overlap between the pending claims and the claims resolved by the order.”).

WOLF, LEWIS, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harper v. Richardson, 199 So. 3d 544, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 13733, 2016 WL 4766084 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

199 So. 3d 544 (Harper v. Richardson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jensen v. Whetstine
985 So. 2d 1218 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)