Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Harper v. Richardson

Harper v. Richardson

199 So. 3d 544, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 13733, 2016 WL 4766084
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 13, 2016
DocketNo. 1D16-2554
StatusPublished

This text of 199 So. 3d 544 (Harper v. Richardson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Harper v. Richardson, 199 So. 3d 544, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 13733, 2016 WL 4766084 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED. Jensen v. Whetstine, 985 So.2d 1218, 1220 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008) (“An order is not an appealable partial final order where there is a factual overlap between the pending claims and the claims resolved by the order.”).

WOLF, LEWIS, and OSTERHAUS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jensen v. Whetstine
985 So. 2d 1218 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
199 So. 3d 544, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 13733, 2016 WL 4766084, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harper-v-richardson-fladistctapp-2016.