Harper v. Reily
1 D.C. 100
This text of 1 D.C. 100 (Harper v. Reily) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Harper v. Reily, 1 D.C. 100 (D.D.C. 1802).
Opinion
refused a continuance, because the testimony of the defendant’s witness would not be competent, on the principle that the declarations of a witness not under oath, shall not be adduced against the witness’ declarations on oath. Qacere. See Peake, L. E. 84, 85, and 3 Burr. 1244.
On motion, the Court granted a new trial.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
1 D.C. 100, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harper-v-reily-dcd-1802.