Harper v. Reily

11 F. Cas. 583, 1 Cranch 100

This text of 11 F. Cas. 583 (Harper v. Reily) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Harper v. Reily, 11 F. Cas. 583, 1 Cranch 100 (circtddc 1802).

Opinion

THE COURT

refused a continuance, because the testimony of the defendant’s witness would not be competent, on the principle that the declarations of a witness not under oath, shall not be adduced against the witness’ declarations on oath. Quaere. See Peake, Ev. 84, 85, and 3 Burrows, 1244. On motion, THE COURT granted a new trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
11 F. Cas. 583, 1 Cranch 100, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harper-v-reily-circtddc-1802.