Harper v. Prudential Insurance of America

102 A.D.2d 863, 477 N.Y.S.2d 305, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19067
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 18, 1984·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

— In an action to compel the defendant to pay over to plaintiff the proceeds of a life insurance policy, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Rubenfeld, J.), dated December 14, 1983, which denied her motion for reargument of a prior motion by the plaintiff for summary judgment, which had been denied, and a cross motion by the defendant for summary judgment dismissing the complaint for failure to state a cause of action, which had been granted. 11 Appeal dismissed, without costs or disbursements. 11 An order denying a motion for reargument is not appealable (see Mader v Mader, 101 AD2d 881; Roberts v Connelly, 35 AD2d 813). Rubin, J. P., Boyers, Lawrence and Fiber, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Harper v. Prudential Insurance of America, 102 A.D.2d 863, 477 N.Y.S.2d 305, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19067 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

102 A.D.2d 863 (Harper v. Prudential Insurance of America) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Marsico v. Southland Corp.
148 A.D.2d 506 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
Cassidy v. County of Nassau
146 A.D.2d 595 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
McKee v. Coughlin
142 A.D.2d 798 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
George v. Bridbord
113 A.D.2d 869 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)