Harper v. Prudential Insurance of America
This text of 102 A.D.2d 863 (Harper v. Prudential Insurance of America) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— In an action to compel the defendant to pay over to plaintiff the proceeds of a life insurance policy, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Rubenfeld, J.), dated December 14, 1983, which denied her motion for reargument of a prior motion by the plaintiff for summary judgment, which had been denied, and a cross motion by the defendant for summary judgment dismissing the complaint for failure to state a cause of action, which had been granted. 11 Appeal dismissed, without costs or disbursements. 11 An order denying a motion for reargument is not appealable (see Mader v Mader, 101 AD2d 881; Roberts v Connelly, 35 AD2d 813). Rubin, J. P., Boyers, Lawrence and Fiber, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
102 A.D.2d 863, 477 N.Y.S.2d 305, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 19067, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harper-v-prudential-insurance-of-america-nyappdiv-1984.