Harper v. Poway Unified School District

127 S. Ct. 1484, 549 U.S. 1262
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedMarch 5, 2007
Docket06-595
StatusPublished
Cited by42 cases

This text of 127 S. Ct. 1484 (Harper v. Poway Unified School District) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Harper v. Poway Unified School District, 127 S. Ct. 1484, 549 U.S. 1262 (U.S. 2007).

Opinion

127 S.Ct. 1484 (2007)

Tyler Chase HARPER, a Minor, By and Through His Parents Ron HARPER, et ux., et al., petitioners,
v.
POWAY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al.

No. 06-595.

Supreme Court of United States.

March 5, 2007.

On petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Motion of Kelsie J. Harper for leave to intervene denied. Petition for writ of certiorari granted. Petitioner seeks review of the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, which affirmed the district court's denial of petitioner's motion for a preliminary injunction. The district court, however, has now entered final judgment dismissing petitioner's claims for injunctive relief as moot. We have previously dismissed interlocutory appeals from the denials of motions for temporary injunctions once final judgment has been entered. See Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Kuykendall, 265 U.S. 196, 205-206, 44 S.Ct. 553, 68 L.Ed. 975 (1924); Shaffer v. Carter, 252 U.S. 37, 44, 40 S.Ct. 221, 64 L.Ed. 445 (1920). In this case, vacatur of the prior judgment is also appropriate to "`clea[r] the path for future relitigation of the issues between the parties and [to] eliminat[e] a judgment, review of which was prevented through happenstance.'" Anderson v. Green, 513 U.S. 557, 560, 115 S.Ct. 1059, 130 L.Ed.2d 1050 (1995) (per curiam) (quoting United States v. Munsingwear, Inc., 340 U.S. 36, 40, 71 S.Ct. 104, 95 L.Ed. 36 (1950)) (alterations in original). The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit with instructions to dismiss the appeal as moot. See United States v. Munsingwear, Inc., supra. Reported below: 445 F.3d 1166.

Justice BREYER dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Olympus Spa v. Armstrong
Ninth Circuit, 2026
L. M. v. Middleborough
Supreme Court, 2025
Waseem Daker v. Brian Owens
Eleventh Circuit, 2025
Waseem Daker v. Timothy Ward
Eleventh Circuit, 2024
L. M. v. Town of Middleborough, Massachusetts
103 F.4th 854 (First Circuit, 2024)
Scheff v. Banks
Second Circuit, 2023
Koppula v. Jaddou
72 F.4th 83 (Fifth Circuit, 2023)
Capriole v. Uber Technologies, Inc.
991 F.3d 339 (First Circuit, 2021)
Neil O'Brien v. John Welty
818 F.3d 920 (Ninth Circuit, 2016)
Sean Woodson v. Richard Colajezzi
573 F. App'x 204 (Third Circuit, 2014)
John Dariano v. Morgan Hill Unified School Dis
745 F.3d 354 (Ninth Circuit, 2014)
Dariano v. Morgan Hill Unified School District
767 F.3d 764 (Ninth Circuit, 2014)
Hardwick Ex Rel. Hardwick v. Heyward
711 F.3d 426 (Fourth Circuit, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
127 S. Ct. 1484, 549 U.S. 1262, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harper-v-poway-unified-school-district-scotus-2007.