Harper v. Municipality No. One

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Harper v. Municipality No. One

12 La. Ann. 346

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided April 15, 1857·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Spoeford, J.

This is an action for the alleged unwarrantable and illegal destruction of a railroad belonging to the plaintiff, of which the iron and other materials are declared to be worth $7500, for which sum the suit is brought.

[347]*347The injury is said to have been done in 1840, and the suit was instituted in Juno, 1850.

We concur with the District Judge, that the action must, on the whole, be considered as an action in damages for an alleged tort.

The plea of prescription was, therefore, properly sustained.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Spoeford, J.

This is an action for the alleged unwarrantable and illegal destruction of a railroad belonging to the plaintiff, of which the iron and other materials are declared to be worth $7500, for which sum the suit is brought.

[347]*347The injury is said to have been done in 1840, and the suit was instituted in Juno, 1850.

We concur with the District Judge, that the action must, on the whole, be considered as an action in damages for an alleged tort.

The plea of prescription was, therefore, properly sustained.

Judgment affirmed.

Harper v. Municipality No. One, 12 La. Ann. 346 (La. 1857).

Pincite

12 La. Ann. 346 (Harper v. Municipality No. One) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related