Harper v. McCloud

Fourth Circuit

Harper v. McCloud

575 F. App'x 206

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedJune 23, 2014

DocketNo. 14-6541

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 575 F. App'x 206 (Harper v. McCloud) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Harper v. McCloud, 575 F. App'x 206 (4th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Cedeal T. Harper appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Harper v. McCloud, No. 2:12-cv-00656, 2014 WL 1159129 (S.D.W.Va. Mar. 21, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Cedeal T. Harper appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Harper v. McCloud, No. 2:12-cv-00656, 2014 WL 1159129 (S.D.W.Va. Mar. 21, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

575 F. App'x 206, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/harper-v-mccloud-ca4-2014.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack